The best smart lock overall in this roundup is the Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400, a strong fit for Apple Home users who want Home Key and fingerprint entry. The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE stands out for Matter over Thread, while the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 makes fingerprint access a central part of a simpler deadbolt setup. The main tradeoffs are smart-home compatibility, whether Wi-Fi is built in, and how much you value fingerprints, keypad codes, or a conventional key. Door compatibility and installation needs can matter as much as the feature list. Read on for the full comparison and advice on choosing a lock that fits your home.
Get privacy and security gear delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
Key Takeaways
- Aqara U400 is the most differentiated pick for Apple households: Apple Home Key and UWB access set it apart from the fingerprint-and-keypad combinations common across the list.
- ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is the standout for smart-home flexibility: Matter over Thread gives it a different connectivity path from locks that rely on Wi-Fi or a brand-specific app.
- Fingerprint entry is the roundup’s most common convenience feature, not a guarantee of the same setup: several models pair it with a keypad, while others differ in connectivity and lock format.
- Handle and knob bundles change the installation decision: Philips Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Handle, Veise VE027-K, and Ulecoce U68 are worth comparing when a matching entry set matters.
- Choosing by connection type can prevent a mismatch: Wi-Fi models suit remote app access without a separate hub, while Thread and other smart-home approaches may better fit homes already built around compatible platforms.
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400, Apple Home Key, Fingerprint Deadbolt, Black | ![]() | Best for Apple Home and Hands-Free Entry | Model: U400 (DL-D06E) | Connectivity: Matter over Thread, UWB, NFC, Bluetooth | Entry methods: UWB, Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice control, NFC card, physical key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Handle, Fingerprint Unlock, Keypad, and Auto-Lock | ![]() | Best for Hub-Free Remote Access | Model: DDL220X-1HW-MB | Entry methods: Fingerprint, app, password, voice control, physical key | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Zylenor Smart Keyless Door Lock with Wi-Fi and Keypad | ![]() | Best for Timed Locking and Alerts | Lock type: Combination deadbolt | Entry methods: Password, Wi-Fi, app, voice, mechanical key | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best Simple Keypad Deadbolt | Model: TE001 | Finish: Satin Nickel | Access codes: Up to 20 user codes and one temporary one-time code | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad | ![]() | Best for Flexible DIY Access | Model: YR01 | Entry methods: Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key; Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway | App connection: Bluetooth | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadbolt Lock with 2 Knobs – Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best for Flexible Household Access | Connectivity: 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi | Access methods: Fingerprint, PIN, IC card, physical key, app, voice | Fingerprint response: 0.2 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE012W Wi-Fi Fingerprint Smart Lock, Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best for Straightforward Remote Management | Connectivity: Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required | Access methods: App, fingerprint, PIN, one-time code, physical key, voice | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 20 fingerprints | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt | ![]() | Best for Battery Backup Options | Lock type: Biometric smart deadbolt with keypad | Connectivity: Wi-Fi | Access methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad code, physical key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad Deadbolt with Knob Set, Matte Black | ![]() | Best for Large Fingerprint Rosters | Model: Ulecoce U68 | Access methods: Fingerprint, keypad, app, one-touch, physical key | Fingerprint capacity: 512 sets | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Tapo DL110 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint Recognition | ![]() | Best Rechargeable Option | Access methods: Fingerprint, keypad passcode, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, smart-home assistant, backup key | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 100 fingerprints | Fingerprint unlock time: 0.42 seconds | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Satin Nickel | ![]() | Best for Flexible Local Access | Model: VE017 | Finish: Satin nickel | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 Gateway, mechanical key | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Yamiry Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint Entry | ![]() | Best Smart Knob for Shared Access | Model: YR05 | Material: Aluminum | Color: Matte black | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry | ![]() | Best for Built-In Remote Access | Model: DDL242X-1HW | Unlock methods: App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa or Google Assistant | Wi-Fi: Built-in 2.4 GHz; no hub required | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Fingerprint Access and Matter over Thread | ![]() | Best for Matter-Ready Smart Homes | Model: Bolt SE | Access methods: Fingerprint, passcode, smartphone app, web portal, eKey/code sharing, voice control, mechanical keys | Fingerprint capacity: Up to 50 | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 with Fingerprint Keyless Entry | ![]() | Best for Multiple Everyday Entry Options | Model: T8506 | Lock type: Deadbolt | Unlock methods: Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant | VIEW ON AMAZON | See Our Full Breakdown |
| smart lock | Model | Connectivity |
|---|---|---|
| Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 | U400 (DL-D06E) | Matter over Thread, UWB, NFC, Bluetooth |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Lock with | DDL220X-1HW-MB | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required |
| Zylenor Smart Keyless Door Loc | — | Wi-Fi |
| TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Dead | TE001 | — |
| Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door | YR01 | — |
| Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadb | — | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi |
| Veise VE012W Wi-Fi Fingerprint | — | Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required |
| Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint | — | Wi-Fi |
| Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad | Ulecoce U68 | — |
| Tapo DL110 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbol | — | — |
| Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart | VE017 | — |
| Yamiry Keypad Smart Door Knob | YR05 | Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway |
| Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt L | DDL242X-1HW | — |
| ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart L | Bolt SE | 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Matter over Thread |
| eufy Security Smart Lock C220 | T8506 | Built-in Wi-Fi |
More Details on Our Top Picks
Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400, Apple Home Key, Fingerprint Deadbolt, Black
The Aqara U400 is the strongest fit here for buyers who want hands-free unlocking alongside several backups: UWB, Apple Home Key, fingerprint, passcode, NFC card, and a physical key. Its Matter over Thread connection gives it broader ecosystem appeal than the Yamiry YR01, whose remote control and Alexa access depend on a separate gateway. The tradeoff is that UWB isn’t a simple out-of-box feature: it requires compatible Apple devices and a Thread-enabled Apple hub, so setup may take more planning than the straightforward TEEHO TE001 keypad lock. A rechargeable battery with USB-C charging avoids disposable cells, though a stated runtime of up to six months means charging is part of ownership. I’d rank it highly for a connected Apple household, but less highly for someone seeking a basic keypad deadbolt.
Pros:- UWB hands-free unlocking can open the door without a keypad interaction when compatible devices and a hub are in place
- Offers fingerprint, Apple Home Key, passcode, NFC card, and physical-key access
- Matter over Thread supports integration across compatible smart-home ecosystems
- Rechargeable battery charges through USB-C without removing the lock
Cons:- Full UWB functionality depends on compatible Apple devices and a Thread-enabled Apple hub
- Multiple ecosystem requirements can make setup more involved than a standalone keypad lock
- Battery runtime is up to six months, so periodic recharging is part of ownership
Best for: Apple households with a compatible hub and devices that want hands-free arrival unlocking plus multiple backup entry methods
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a simple keypad-only setup or who lack the Apple devices and Thread-enabled hub needed for full UWB functionality
- Model:U400 (DL-D06E)
- Connectivity:Matter over Thread, UWB, NFC, Bluetooth
- Entry methods:UWB, Apple Home Key, fingerprint, touchscreen passcode, voice control, NFC card, physical key
- Battery:Rechargeable lithium; up to 6 months per charge
- Charging:USB-C; recharge without removing the lock
- Apple compatibility:Compatible with listed HomePod, Apple TV, Apple Watch, and iPhone models; iPhone 11 or later with iOS 18.5 or later
- Certification:BHMA-certified
- Color:Black
Our verdict“Choose the Aqara U400 if you have a compatible Apple home setup and value hands-free entry more than a simpler installation.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Handle, Fingerprint Unlock, Keypad, and Auto-Lock
Philips makes remote access more direct than the Yamiry YR01: its built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi connects to the HomeAccess app without a separately sold gateway. That means owners can manage access, receive alerts, and check entry logs remotely, while up to 100 passcodes give households room for scheduled or temporary access. Fingerprint entry is also included, but its 50-print capacity is less generous than the passcode limit. Auto-lock can be set from 5 to 180 seconds, with Passage and Privacy modes for times when automatic locking is inconvenient. Compared with the TEEHO TE001, this Philips model offers app-based monitoring and several electronic entry methods, but it brings Wi-Fi setup and a 2.4 GHz network requirement. I’d pick it for connected households, not for anyone who wants a purely offline lock.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control, alerts, and entry logs without a separate hub
- Supports fingerprint, app, passcode, voice assistant, and physical-key entry
- Stores up to 100 passcodes, including scheduled and temporary codes
- Adjustable auto-lock, Passage Mode, and Privacy Mode offer flexible door behavior
Cons:- Wi-Fi connection is limited to 2.4 GHz
- Fingerprint storage is limited to 50 users
- Remote app features make it more dependent on network connectivity than the TEEHO TE001
Best for: Households that want app-based remote locking, alerts, entry records, and many guest or family passcodes without buying a hub
Not ideal for: Buyers with only a 5 GHz Wi-Fi network or those who prefer a basic, offline keypad deadbolt like the TEEHO TE001
- Model:DDL220X-1HW-MB
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, app, password, voice control, physical key
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50 fingerprints
- Passcode capacity:Up to 100 passcodes
- Auto-lock delay:5–180 seconds
- Voice assistants:Alexa and Google Assistant
- Warranty:2 years
Our verdict“Choose this Philips lock if hub-free remote management and a large supply of passcodes matter more than offline simplicity.”
Zylenor Smart Keyless Door Lock with Wi-Fi and Keypad
The Zylenor stands apart from the TEEHO TE001 by pairing keypad access with Wi-Fi app control, voice unlocking, timed locking, and an anti-hijacking alert. That wider feature set suits buyers who want more than a local code pad, while the mechanical key offers a backup if electronic entry is unavailable. Its stated battery life of up to ten months is longer than the Aqara U400’s stated six-month runtime, but it uses eight AA batteries sold separately rather than a rechargeable pack. USB-C is for emergency charging, not a replacement for planning around the batteries. The IPX4 rating and 35–50 mm door-thickness range are practical fit checks before buying. I’d shortlist it for app-minded households, though the sparse included components make it less appealing for buyers wanting a complete-looking kit.
Pros:- Combines keypad, app, Wi-Fi, voice, and mechanical-key entry
- Auto-lock and timed-lock features support different daily routines
- Anti-hijacking alert can send a notification
- USB-C emergency charging provides a backup when batteries are depleted
Cons:- Requires eight AA batteries, which are sold separately
- Mechanical key remains an important emergency backup
- IPX4 rating and 35–50 mm door-thickness range may limit suitability for some doors and exposure conditions
Best for: Buyers who want Wi-Fi and voice control, timed locking, and an alert feature in a keypad deadbolt
Not ideal for: Shoppers who want batteries included, a rechargeable battery system, or stronger stated outdoor protection than IPX4
- Lock type:Combination deadbolt
- Entry methods:Password, Wi-Fi, app, voice, mechanical key
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Power:8 AA 1.5V batteries, sold separately
- Battery life:Up to 10 months
- Emergency charging:USB-C
- Water resistance:IPX4
- Door thickness:35–50 mm
Our verdict“Pick the Zylenor if timed locking and app alerts matter, and you’re comfortable supplying and maintaining eight AA batteries.”
TEEHO TE001 Keyless Entry Deadbolt with Keypad, Satin Nickel
The TEEHO TE001 is the most straightforward choice in this batch: it skips app control and Wi-Fi, focusing instead on local keypad codes, one-touch locking, and a temporary guest code. That makes it simpler than the Philips DDL220X-1HW-MB, which adds remote logs and app management but also relies on a wireless connection. The TE001 supports up to 20 user codes, a more modest capacity than Philips’s 100, so it suits a household rather than a large roster of rotating visitors. Its IP54 weather resistance and stated battery life of up to 365 days suit buyers who want a keypad at an exposed entry, though the four AA batteries are not included. Check the door cutout before ordering: this model requires a 2-1/8-inch hole and does not fit a 38 mm hole.
Pros:- Stores up to 20 family access codes plus a temporary one-time guest code
- One-touch locking and adjustable auto-lock make everyday operation simple
- IP54 weather resistance and low-battery alert support use at an exterior door
- Includes two backup keys and installation hardware
Cons:- No app, Wi-Fi, fingerprint, or remote access features
- Four AA batteries are not included
- Requires a 2-1/8-inch door hole and is not compatible with a 38 mm hole
Best for: Households seeking a no-app keypad deadbolt with family codes, a one-time guest code, and basic auto-lock
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access, entry logs, biometric unlocking, or a fit for a 38 mm door hole
- Model:TE001
- Finish:Satin Nickel
- Access codes:Up to 20 user codes and one temporary one-time code
- Auto-lock delay:10–99 seconds
- Power:4 AA batteries, not included
- Battery life:Up to 365 days
- Weather resistance:IP54
- Compatible door hole:2-1/8 in (54 mm)
Our verdict“Choose the TEEHO TE001 for reliable code-based entry without connected features, provided your door has the required hole size.”
Yamiry Smart Fingerprint Door Lock with Keypad
The Yamiry YR01 is a flexible retrofit-style pick for buyers who want fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key-fob, and mechanical-key access without drilling on most standard American wooden doors. Its reversible handle also accommodates left- or right-handed doors, a practical fit advantage over choosing a lock based on a fixed handle direction. Compared with the Aqara U400, Yamiry offers key fobs and a simpler DIY installation, but it lacks Aqara’s Matter over Thread and hands-free UWB approach. Remote control and Alexa are possible only with a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway, so the lock’s app flexibility is limited to Bluetooth unless you add that accessory. I’d favor it for households that want varied local entry options; buyers who need remote access from the outset should look at the Philips Wi-Fi lock instead.
Pros:- Provides fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key-fob, and mechanical-key entry
- Supports temporary and permanent access codes and unlock records
- Reversible handle fits left- or right-handed doors
- Includes two key fobs, two mechanical keys, and an adjustable latch
Cons:- Remote control and Alexa access require a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Bluetooth app access does not provide remote control by itself
- Compatibility is described for most standard American wooden doors, so unusual door types may not fit
Best for: DIY homeowners with standard American wooden doors who want fingerprint and key-fob entry plus temporary or permanent code management
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote access or Alexa control immediately without purchasing a separate Wi-Fi gateway
- Model:YR01
- Entry methods:Fingerprint, Bluetooth app, passcode, key fob, mechanical key; Alexa with separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- App connection:Bluetooth
- Remote access:Requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Door compatibility:Most standard American wooden doors
- Handle orientation:Reversible for left- or right-handed doors
- Installation:DIY with a screwdriver; no additional drilling
- Included access hardware:2 key fobs and 2 mechanical keys
Our verdict“Choose the Yamiry YR01 if you want multiple local entry methods and easy DIY installation, but not if remote access is a must-have.”
Veise VE027-K WiFi Smart Deadbolt Lock with 2 Knobs – Satin Nickel
I’d choose the Veise VE027-K when different people need different ways to enter: it combines fingerprint, PIN, IC card, physical key, app, and voice access. Its built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports remote control and alerts without a separate hub, giving it an advantage over gateway-dependent options such as the Ulecoce U68 for out-of-home management. The listed fingerprint response is especially quick at 0.2 seconds, though storage stops at 20 fingerprints, so larger households may need to rely on PINs or cards. Its IP65 rating offers stronger stated weather protection than the VE012W’s IP55 rating. The tradeoffs are eight AA batteries that are not included and a more involved setup if you plan to manage many codes and permissions.
Pros:- Fingerprint, PIN, IC card, key, app, and voice access give household members choices.
- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote control and activity alerts without a separate hub.
- IP65 weather rating is higher than the VE012W’s IP55 rating.
- DIY installation requires no wiring and supports standard doors 1⅜–2 inches thick.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are required and are not included.
- Capacity for 20 fingerprints may be limiting for larger households.
- Managing digital keys and permissions may take extra setup for less technical users.
Best for: Households that want several entry methods, remote access without a hub, and weather protection for an exposed entry.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a simple keypad-only setup or do not want to supply and replace eight AA batteries.
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi
- Access methods:Fingerprint, PIN, IC card, physical key, app, voice
- Fingerprint response:0.2 seconds
- Fingerprint capacity:20 fingerprints
- PIN capacity:100 PIN codes; unlimited one-time passwords
- Power:8 AA batteries, not included; up to 240 days
- Weather and security:IP65; BHMA/ANSI Grade 3
- Door compatibility:1⅜–2 inches thick
Our verdict“Choose the VE027-K if you want hub-free remote access and several ways to share entry, but skip it if you need a larger fingerprint roster or rechargeable power.”
Veise VE012W Wi-Fi Fingerprint Smart Lock, Satin Nickel
The Veise VE012W puts everyday remote management—app control, activity alerts, and adjustable auto-lock—alongside fingerprint and PIN entry. Its built-in Wi-Fi means you can manage the lock away from home without adding a hub, much like the VE027-K; the difference is that the VE027-K lists an IP65 rating, while this model is IP55 rated. That makes the VE012W a more straightforward fit for a sheltered standard entry than a spot where stronger weather protection is a priority. Anti-peeping PIN entry adds a useful privacy layer, and one-time codes suit guests who should not keep permanent access. The limits are 20 stored fingerprints and the need for eight AA batteries, which are not included. I’d favor it over the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 for built-in voice control, but the Wyze includes batteries and USB-C emergency power.
Pros:- Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi supports remote management without a separate hub.
- Fingerprint, PIN, one-time code, key, app, and voice access cover varied routines.
- Adjustable auto-lock delay and activity alerts help manage access remotely.
- Anti-peeping PIN entry helps obscure a code from nearby observers.
Cons:- Eight AA batteries are required and are not included.
- Fingerprint storage is limited to 20 users.
- IP55 weather resistance is lower than the VE027-K’s stated IP65 rating.
Best for: Owners of standard U.S. doors who want hub-free remote control, guest codes, and automatic relocking.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need a larger fingerprint capacity, stronger stated weather resistance, or a rechargeable battery.
- Connectivity:Built-in 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi; no hub required
- Access methods:App, fingerprint, PIN, one-time code, physical key, voice
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 20 fingerprints
- PIN capacity:Up to 100 custom PINs
- Auto-lock delay:10–180 seconds
- Weather and security:IP55; BHMA/ANSI Grade 3
- Power:8 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries, not included
- Door compatibility:1⅜–2 inches thick
Our verdict“Pick the VE012W for hub-free app management and flexible guest access on a sheltered door, but choose another model if battery convenience or higher weather protection matters more.”
Wyze Lock Bolt v2 Fingerprint Smart Deadbolt
The Wyze Lock Bolt v2 is a practical pick if you want fingerprint entry but also value a fallback when the batteries run down. Alongside app, keypad, and physical-key access, it has USB-C emergency power—a useful distinction from both Veise models, which rely on replaceable AA batteries and do not list an equivalent emergency-power feature. Wyze includes its eight AA batteries, while the Tapo DL110 takes a different route with a rechargeable battery and a longer estimated service interval. The Bolt v2’s fingerprint scan takes about 0.5 seconds and adapts over time, but the supplied details do not give a fingerprint capacity or a specific Wi-Fi band. Its IP53 rating is also a modest weather-protection claim, so I’d place it on a more sheltered door rather than choose it for the weather exposure covered by the VE027-K’s IP65 rating.
Pros:- USB-C emergency power offers a fallback if the main batteries are depleted.
- Eight AA batteries are included.
- Fingerprint, app, keypad code, and physical-key entry provide several ways in.
- Adaptive fingerprint recognition and auto-lock support everyday convenience.
Cons:- The IP53 rating is lower than the VE027-K’s stated IP65 weather resistance.
- Remote control features depend on Wi-Fi and the Wyze app.
- The provided specifications do not state the number of stored fingerprints or codes.
Best for: Wyze app users who want fingerprint and keypad access with a USB-C emergency-power option and included batteries.
Not ideal for: Buyers prioritizing high weather resistance, a rechargeable main battery, or a stated capacity for fingerprints and codes.
- Lock type:Biometric smart deadbolt with keypad
- Connectivity:Wi-Fi
- Access methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad code, physical key
- Fingerprint unlock:About 0.5 seconds; adaptive recognition
- Power:8 included AA batteries; up to 8 months
- Emergency power:USB-C
- Weather resistance:IP53
- Additional features:Auto-lock and tamper alarms
Our verdict“Choose the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 if emergency USB-C power and an included battery set matter more than a rechargeable battery or stronger weather rating.”
Ulecoce U68 Fingerprint Keypad Deadbolt with Knob Set, Matte Black
The Ulecoce U68 stands apart in this group for its stated capacity of 512 fingerprint sets, far beyond the 20-fingerprint limits listed for the VE027-K and VE012W. That makes it a better fit on paper for shared properties or households with many regular users. Fingerprint recognition is listed at 0.3 seconds, and the five entry methods include fingerprint, keypad, app, one-touch locking, and a physical key. The compromise is smart-home integration: Alexa and Google Assistant require a separate gateway, unlike the Veise models’ built-in Wi-Fi and direct voice-assistant compatibility. The description mentions remote app control and access logs, but does not specify the lock’s connectivity standard, weather rating, or security grade. I’d weigh that missing detail carefully before choosing it for an exposed exterior door.
Pros:- Stated capacity of 512 fingerprint sets exceeds the 20-fingerprint limits of the Veise models.
- Fingerprint recognition is listed at 0.3 seconds.
- Fingerprint, keypad, app, one-touch, and key access provide multiple entry options.
- Adjustable auto-lock and access logs support routine security management.
Cons:- Alexa and Google Assistant control requires a separate gateway.
- The provided specifications do not state a weather-resistance rating or security grade.
- The description does not specify the connectivity standard used for app control.
Best for: Shared homes or properties with many regular users who want a large stated fingerprint capacity and several local entry methods.
Not ideal for: Buyers who require built-in Wi-Fi, direct voice-assistant support without extra hardware, or published weather and security ratings.
- Model:Ulecoce U68
- Access methods:Fingerprint, keypad, app, one-touch, physical key
- Fingerprint capacity:512 sets
- Fingerprint recognition:0.3 seconds
- Auto-lock delay:5–60 seconds, adjustable
- Voice assistant compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant with a separate gateway
- Installation:DIY with a screwdriver; left- or right-hand doors
- Included keys:5 backup keys
Our verdict“Consider the U68 for its unusually large stated fingerprint roster, but choose a Veise model if built-in Wi-Fi and clearly listed weather protection are higher priorities.”
Tapo DL110 Smart Wi-Fi Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint Recognition
I’d shortlist the Tapo DL110 for buyers who want a rechargeable smart lock and expect to register more than a few household members. It stores up to 100 fingerprints, compared with 20 on each Veise model, and its removable USB-C-charged battery is rated for up to a year in Wi-Fi mode or up to two years in Bluetooth mode. Those figures depend on use and settings, but they offer a different power approach from the eight-AA-battery locks in this batch. Six access methods include fingerprint, keypad, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, voice assistant, and backup key, while resident and guest codes help separate ongoing access from temporary visits. The fingerprint unlock time is 0.42 seconds, not the fastest listed here. Battery life can vary, and some features depend on connectivity, so this is less suited to buyers seeking a wholly connection-independent setup.
Pros:- Stores up to 100 fingerprints, more than either Veise model in this batch.
- Removable rechargeable battery charges through USB-C.
- Supports resident, guest, one-time, and scheduled access codes.
- Works with Alexa, Google Home, and Samsung SmartThings.
Cons:- Estimated battery life changes with usage, settings, and connectivity mode.
- Some functions rely on Wi-Fi or Bluetooth.
- The listed 0.42-second fingerprint unlock is slower than the VE027-K’s stated 0.2-second response.
Best for: Households with many registered users who prefer a rechargeable battery and need permanent, scheduled, or temporary access codes.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want a simple, connection-independent lock or who prefer replaceable AA batteries over charging a removable pack.
- Access methods:Fingerprint, keypad passcode, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, smart-home assistant, backup key
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 100 fingerprints
- Fingerprint unlock time:0.42 seconds
- Battery:Removable rechargeable battery; USB-C charging
- Estimated battery life:Up to 1 year in Wi-Fi mode; up to 2 years in Bluetooth mode
- Smart-home compatibility:Amazon Alexa, Google Home, Samsung SmartThings
- Security features:Auto-lock, suspicious activity alerts, activity log
- Included keys:2 backup keys
Our verdict“Choose the Tapo DL110 if rechargeable power and room for a large fingerprint roster outweigh the convenience of replaceable AA batteries.”
Veise VE017 Fingerprint Smart Door Lock with App Control, Satin Nickel
The Veise VE017 is a strong fit for households that want several ways to get inside without relying on a live internet connection for everyday entry. Its fingerprint, keypad, fob, app, and mechanical-key options make it more adaptable than a keypad-only choice such as the TEEHO TE001, while configurable permissions and activity logs help owners manage who can enter. The fingerprint reader is stated to unlock in under 0.2 seconds, and AES-128 encrypted on-device storage keeps access data on the lock. DIY installation is designed to require only a screwdriver. The tradeoff is that remote control and voice-assistant support depend on a separately sold G1 Gateway; without it, this is less connected than the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt. Batteries are also not included, and actual battery life varies with use.
Pros:- Provides fingerprint, app, keypad, fob, code-sharing, and mechanical-key entry
- Fingerprint unlocking is stated to take under 0.2 seconds
- Stores access data locally with AES-128 encryption
- Designed for screwdriver-only DIY installation
Cons:- G1 Gateway is sold separately for remote access and voice-assistant features
- Four AA batteries are not included, and stated battery life varies with usage
Best for: Households that want fingerprint, keypad, fob, and key access, plus local user management without making remote control a requirement.
Not ideal for: Buyers who expect built-in Wi-Fi remote access or voice control out of the box, since those features require a separate G1 Gateway.
- Model:VE017
- Finish:Satin nickel
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, authorized access, fob card, code, code sharing, voice assistant with G1 Gateway, mechanical key
- Auto-lock timer:0–180 seconds
- Battery:4 AA/LR6 alkaline batteries; not included
- Stated battery life:About 12 months; varies with use
- Data security:AES-128 encrypted on-device storage
- Smart home compatibility:Alexa and Google Assistant with separately sold G1 Gateway
- Water resistance:IP55
Our verdict“Choose the VE017 for versatile local entry and encrypted on-device access data, but pick the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt if built-in remote control matters more.”
Yamiry Keypad Smart Door Knob Lock with Fingerprint Entry
The Yamiry YR05 makes sense for people seeking a smart door knob rather than a deadbolt, with five entry methods and room for up to 50 passwords and fingerprints. That capacity gives a busy household or small shared space more flexibility than the Veise VE017’s appeal as a multi-method deadbolt, while the included two key fobs and two physical keys provide practical backups. It fits most American standard doors and is designed for screwdriver installation. The main limitation is connectivity: app control uses nearby Bluetooth, and remote operation requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway. That makes it less convenient for managing entry away from home than the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, which has built-in Wi-Fi. Buyers should also confirm they specifically want a knob-format lock, rather than a deadbolt replacement.
Pros:- Supports app, password, key fob, fingerprint, and physical-key entry
- Stores up to 50 passwords and fingerprints
- Includes two physical keys and two key fobs
- Designed for screwdriver installation on most American standard doors
Cons:- Remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- App control nearby depends on Bluetooth connectivity
Best for: Shared households and small offices that want many stored fingerprints or passwords and prefer a smart knob with physical-key and fob backups.
Not ideal for: Buyers who need remote app control without an added gateway, or who are specifically replacing a deadbolt rather than a knob.
- Model:YR05
- Material:Aluminum
- Color:Matte black
- Unlock methods:App, password, key fob, fingerprint, physical key
- Stored passwords and fingerprints:Up to 50
- Connectivity:Bluetooth; remote control requires a separately sold Wi-Fi gateway
- Door compatibility:Most American standard doors
- Dimensions:5.62 × 2.69 × 3 inches
- Included components:Front plate, back plate, hardware assembly, user guide, latch, 2 physical keys, 2 key fobs
Our verdict“Pick the Yamiry YR05 if you want a credential-heavy smart knob with included backup keys and fobs, not built-in remote access.”
Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt Lock with Fingerprint and Keyless Entry
The Philips DDL242X-1HW stands out for buyers who want remote app access without adding a bridge or gateway. Its built-in Wi-Fi pairs with fingerprint, passcodes, and a physical key, while support for up to 100 custom passcodes gives owners room for one-time or scheduled guest access. That is a higher stated code capacity than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s 50 passcodes, though the ULTRALOQ adds Matter over Thread support for buyers building around a compatible hub. Philips also offers access alerts, history, and an adjustable auto-lock timer. The tradeoff is dependence on a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network, with the router recommended within 65 feet for better remote control. Batteries are not included, and there is no door sensor in the package.
Pros:- Built-in Wi-Fi enables remote operation without an extra hub
- Supports up to 100 custom passcodes, including one-time or scheduled guest codes
- Combines app, passcode, fingerprint, physical-key, and voice-control access
- Provides access alerts, history, and adjustable auto-lock settings
Cons:- Requires a 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi network, with the router recommended within 65 feet
- AA alkaline batteries are not included
- Door sensor is not included
Best for: Homeowners who want remote lock control and guest-code management through built-in Wi-Fi without buying a separate gateway.
Not ideal for: People whose router does not provide reliable 2.4 GHz coverage near the door, or buyers who want a door sensor included.
- Model:DDL242X-1HW
- Unlock methods:App, passcode, fingerprint, physical key, Alexa or Google Assistant
- Wi-Fi:Built-in 2.4 GHz; no hub required
- Maximum custom passcodes:100
- Auto-lock timer:10–180 seconds
- Compatible door thickness:1⅜–2 inches (38–50 mm)
- Batteries:AA alkaline (LR6) required; not included
- Door sensor:Not included
Our verdict“Choose Philips for hub-free remote access and a large guest-code capacity; choose the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE if Matter over Thread support matters more.”
ULTRALOQ Bolt SE Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Fingerprint Access and Matter over Thread
The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is the most compelling choice here for buyers who want a lock with both 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Matter over Thread. It pairs fingerprint and passcode entry with app, web portal, voice control, and mechanical keys, and supports activity history, notifications, and access sharing. Its stated capacities of up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes suit homes that need several individual credentials. Compared with the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Deadbolt, the Bolt SE brings Matter over Thread into the mix, but Matter remote access requires a compatible hub; the Philips provides remote control over built-in Wi-Fi without that added hub requirement. The ULTRALOQ’s IP65 rating and zinc-alloy construction also suit exposed exterior doors. Buyers should note that it supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only, and no door sensor is included.
Pros:- Combines fingerprint, passcode, app, web portal, voice, sharing, and mechanical-key access
- Supports up to 50 fingerprints and 50 passcodes
- IP65 weather resistance and zinc-alloy construction suit exterior doors
- Advertised battery life of up to 18 months
Cons:- Matter over Thread remote access requires a compatible hub
- Supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only
- Door sensor is not included
Best for: Smart-home owners who want fingerprint and passcode entry, exterior-door weather resistance, and a path to Matter over Thread with a compatible hub.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want Matter remote access without a compatible hub, need 5 GHz Wi-Fi support, or expect a door sensor in the box.
- Model:Bolt SE
- Access methods:Fingerprint, passcode, smartphone app, web portal, eKey/code sharing, voice control, mechanical keys
- Fingerprint capacity:Up to 50
- Passcode capacity:Up to 50
- Connectivity:2.4 GHz Wi-Fi and Matter over Thread
- Matter hub:Compatible Matter over Thread hub required for Matter remote access
- Battery life:Up to 18 months
- Weather resistance:IP65
- Warranty:Lifetime mechanical coverage; 18-month electronic coverage
Our verdict“Choose the Bolt SE for weather-resistant access and Matter over Thread options if you already have, or plan to add, a compatible hub.”
eufy Security Smart Lock C220 with Fingerprint Keyless Entry
The eufy Security C220 makes everyday entry flexible with six unlocking methods, including fingerprint, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice assistant. Its built-in Wi-Fi also supports remote app control without a bridge, a simpler setup than the Veise VE017, which needs its separately sold G1 Gateway for remote and voice features. The C220 is designed to fit most standard deadbolts and take about 15 minutes to install, and it includes eight AA batteries along with two keys. The main compromise is power demand: its stated battery life is up to eight months on eight AA batteries, shorter than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s advertised maximum of 18 months. Usage can change that figure. Its IP53 rating offers some water resistance, but the ULTRALOQ has a higher IP65 rating for more exposed locations.
Pros:- Offers six entry methods, including fingerprint, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, and voice assistant
- Built-in Wi-Fi allows remote app control without a bridge
- Designed to fit most standard deadbolts with approximately 15-minute installation
- Includes eight AA batteries and two keys
Cons:- Uses eight AA batteries and has a stated battery life of up to eight months
- IP53 water resistance is lower than the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE’s IP65 rating
- Battery life varies with usage frequency
Best for: Households that want several familiar ways to unlock a standard deadbolt, including Apple Watch, with remote app access and batteries supplied.
Not ideal for: Buyers who want longer stated battery life or stronger weather resistance for a particularly exposed entrance.
- Model:T8506
- Lock type:Deadbolt
- Unlock methods:Fingerprint, app, keypad, physical key, Apple Watch, Alexa or Google voice assistant
- Connectivity:Built-in Wi-Fi
- Battery:8 AA batteries; included
- Stated battery life:Up to 8 months
- Installation:Compatible with most standard deadbolts; approximately 15 minutes
- Durability:BHMA Grade 3; IP53 waterproof
- Operating temperature:-22°F to 158°F (-30°C to 70°C)
Our verdict“Pick the eufy C220 for convenient built-in Wi-Fi and varied daily entry choices, but favor the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE for a higher weather-resistance rating and longer stated battery life.”

How We Picked
I ranked these locks by how well their stated features answer common buyer needs: dependable everyday entry options, clear connectivity, practical installation format, and useful compatibility with a smart-home setup. I gave extra weight to options with a distinct advantage, such as Apple Home Key on the Aqara U400 or Matter over Thread on the ULTRALOQ Bolt SE, rather than treating a long feature list as a win by itself. Fingerprint access, keypad codes, app control, and backup entry methods matter because they affect how a household actually gets through the door.
The order also reflects tradeoffs and buyer fit. A lock with a handle or knob set can be a better match for a door refresh than a deadbolt-only unit, while a Wi-Fi model may suit someone who wants remote access without adding a separate bridge. Models with less distinctive positioning rank below picks that offer a clearer reason to choose them. Since door dimensions, existing hardware, connectivity, and platform support vary, I treat compatibility checks as part of the buying decision rather than assuming every lock suits every door.
Factors to Consider When Choosing 15 Best Smart Locks
Before choosing a model, I would narrow the field by how the lock needs to fit your door and household—not by counting features. These checks help prevent buying a lock that works on paper but clashes with your hardware, network, or preferred way of entering.
Match the Lock Format to Your Existing Door
Start by deciding whether you need a deadbolt, a knob, or a full handle set. Replacing only a deadbolt is often a smaller hardware change, while a bundled handle or knob can be useful if the existing set is worn or mismatched. Do not assume a product with a familiar name replaces every part of the entry hardware; check what is included and what stays in place. Measure the door thickness, backset, and bore hole against the manufacturer’s fit requirements before ordering. A mismatch can turn a straightforward installation into a return or extra hardware work. Renters should also check whether the installation can be reversed without leaving changes their lease does not allow.
Choose Connectivity Around Your Home Network
Built-in Wi-Fi, Thread, and hub-based connections involve different tradeoffs, so start with the network and smart-home equipment you already own. Wi-Fi can support remote app control without a separate bridge, but it adds another device competing for wireless coverage and may increase battery demands. Thread can be attractive in a compatible smart-home setup, though it is not a substitute for checking which controller or border router is required. Matter support may help devices work across platforms, but the exact features available can still depend on the lock, app, and controller. Read the compatibility details for remote locking, alerts, and automation separately; a lock appearing in an app does not always mean every function is available there. If your door is far from the router, plan for connection reliability before making connectivity a deciding feature.
Pick Entry Methods for the People Who Use the Door
Fingerprint readers are convenient for people who often arrive with their hands free, while keypads make access easier to share without handing out a physical key. App access can help when you need to manage a lock away from home, but it depends on a phone, an account, and the product’s connection. Think through guests, children, caregivers, and anyone who may not want to use a fingerprint or smartphone. Keep a backup plan for low batteries, network interruptions, or a reader that does not recognize a finger. A physical key can provide reassurance, but only if you have a secure way to carry or store it. The best mix is the one your household can use reliably, not the one with the most unlock methods listed.
Separate Local Access From Remote Control
Some functions can work at the door even when internet service is down, while remote alerts or app commands may depend on the network. Before buying, check which actions are stored locally, whether keypad codes still work offline, and how the lock signals a connection problem. This distinction matters in homes with spotty Wi-Fi or frequent outages. A remote-control feature is only useful if the lock can maintain a stable connection from its installed location. If you mainly want keyless entry for people at home, local keypad or fingerprint operation may matter more than remote access. If you need to let someone in while away, confirm that the app supports that task directly.
Plan for Batteries and Ongoing Access
Smart locks add battery maintenance to a door that once needed little attention, so check the manufacturer’s battery guidance and low-power warnings. Consider who will notice an alert and replace batteries, particularly for a rental or a household where several people share access. Do not wait for a warning to work out how the lock behaves when power runs low; review the stated backup-entry method and keep any required key or backup power option accessible. Wi-Fi and frequent app communication can affect upkeep compared with a more locally focused setup. A lock is only convenient if the household can keep it powered and manage codes or fingerprints when people move in or out. For shared homes, make a simple routine for removing old access rather than leaving unused credentials active.
Pay for Compatibility and Convenience You Will Use
A premium feature is worthwhile when it solves a specific problem, such as hands-free access for an Apple Home household or broader platform integration in an established smart home. It adds little value if your family will mostly use a keypad and does not use the connected features. Before choosing, list the tasks you expect the lock to handle: letting a guest in, checking status remotely, creating temporary codes, or linking entry to another device. Then verify that the specific model and platform support those tasks, rather than relying on a general claim of smart-home compatibility. Bundled handles and knobs may also justify a different choice when replacing more than the deadbolt. This keeps the decision focused on useful capabilities instead of features that may go unused.
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I choose Wi-Fi or Matter over Thread for a smart lock?
Choose based on your existing smart-home setup and whether remote app access is a priority. Built-in Wi-Fi can provide a direct route to remote features, while Matter over Thread can suit a home with compatible Thread infrastructure and a supported controller. Neither label alone guarantees every feature works in the app you prefer, so confirm platform support for the exact lock. If you do not already have the equipment a Thread setup needs, factor that into the decision. For a home with unreliable wireless coverage near the door, connection quality should outweigh protocol preferences.
Is a fingerprint smart lock a good choice for a household with children or guests?
It can be convenient, but I would not make fingerprints the only practical way in. Keypad codes are easier to share with guests and can suit people whose fingerprints are not consistently recognized. Check whether the lock lets you add, change, and remove access credentials in a way that fits your household. For children, consider whether they can reliably use the reader and remember a backup method. A mix of fingerprint, keypad, and physical or other backup access gives the household more options when one method does not work.
Can I install a smart deadbolt without replacing my handle or knob?
Often, a deadbolt-only model is intended to replace the existing deadbolt while leaving the separate handle or knob in place. A bundled lock with a handle or knob may instead be aimed at buyers who want to replace more of the entry set. Check the product’s installation diagram and included parts before ordering, because the product name alone may not make the scope clear. Measure your current door hardware against the stated fit requirements. If the current handle is damaged or you want a coordinated set, a bundle may reduce the need to source matching parts separately.
Will a smart lock still work if my internet goes out?
It depends on the model and the entry method. A keypad or fingerprint reader may continue to provide local access, while remote app commands, alerts, and connected automations can be unavailable without a working connection. Check the manufacturer’s guidance for offline operation rather than assuming all smart functions remain active. Also confirm how the lock behaves when its batteries run low, since a network outage and a power issue are different problems. Keeping a backup access method available is sensible even in a well-connected home.
What should I check before buying a smart lock for a rental or shared home?
First, confirm that the installation is allowed and can be reversed without unwanted changes to the door. For shared access, look for a credential system that lets you add and remove users or codes when someone moves out. Ask who will manage battery changes, app accounts, and access updates so those jobs do not get overlooked. A keypad can make guest access simpler than distributing physical keys, but temporary access features vary by product. Also check whether the lock’s connected features can be used by more than one household member without relying on a single person’s phone account.
Conclusion
For the best overall, I would start with the Aqara UWB Smart Lock U400 if Apple Home Key and fingerprint access match your household; its platform-specific strengths give it the clearest lead. The ULTRALOQ Bolt SE is my best premium-style pick for smart-home flexibility if Matter over Thread fits your setup, while the TEEHO TE001 is the best value-minded choice for shoppers who want keypad entry without making connected features the priority. For beginners, compare the Wi-Fi Philips models and the Wyze Lock Bolt v2 based on whether you want app connectivity or a more direct fingerprint-and-deadbolt setup. If you need a coordinated entry set, focus on the Philips Wi-Fi Smart Lock with Handle, Veise VE027-K, or Ulecoce U68; if fingerprint access is your priority, compare those options with the Tapo DL110 and eufy Security C220. Before choosing, verify the door fit, backup access method, and smart-home compatibility that matter in your home.
Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day Picks
long weekend sales
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.















